Muslim Statistics (Crimes Against Muslims)
| Muslim Statistics | |
| Alcohol & Drugs • Antisemitism • Children • Conspiracy Theories • Crimes Against Muslims • Education & Employment • Health & Disability • Homosexuals • Mosques • Population • Pornography • Ramadan • Science • Scripture • Shari'ah • Slavery • Terrorism • Tolerance • Women • Miscellaneous • One Page View | |
[edit] Norway
Jews in Oslo are more than 6 times more likely than Muslims to experience harassment.
The current row started on Tuesday [June 7, 2011], after Oslo municipality presented a report charting racist and anti-Semitic attitudes amongst 7,212 pupils in 48 secondary schools.
Results show 33.3 percent of Jews experience harassment between two and three times per month, compared with 5.3 percent of Muslims.
According to Vårt Land, Ervin Kohn of Oslo’s Jewish Community (DMT) was discouraged by the report. Despite the high figures, however, Secretary General of umbrella organisation Islamsk Råd Norway (IRN), Mehtab Afsar, claims, “it’s really the Muslims that are given a hard time, and charting Muslim harassment is well overdue.”
The day after the report came out, pro-integration network LIM (Likestilling, Integrering, Mangfold) said it encourages all actors to fight against what it views as increasing anti-Semitism in Norway. At the same time, it was openly critical to Mr Afsar’s statements.
“Unfortunately, it seems as though IRN neither intends to recognize or take the problem of anti-Semitism seriously. Secretary General Afsar would rather focus more upon intimidation of Muslims.”
In a further development in what was becoming a growing rift between two ethnic minorities IRN issued a press statement yesterday, also censuring its own Secretary General, saying, “We wish to state once and for all that we clearly distance ourselves from all types of bullying and harassment, including anti-Semitism.
IRN apologises that some individuals have tried to turn a general societal problem into a particularly Muslim one,” it continues.
“I cannot see that IRN takes anti-Semitism seriously when reading this press release,” says Mr Ervin Kohn[1][edit] United Kingdom
Hate crimes against Muslims in the United Kingdom appear to be dropping, not going up
2003/4 694
2004/5 600
2006/7 632
2007/8 440
2008/9 373
2009/10 353
I chose Tower Hamlets because the vast majority of its non-white population is Muslim, and therefore most of the victims here would have been Muslim. And the truth, in this borough at least, is the polar opposite of what Lambert and Githens-Mazer claim. In this Muslim area, there has been a 50% reduction in hate crime.
The figures for the first four years are from April to April and are from the annual reports of the Metropolitan Police Authority’s Race Hate Crime Forum. The figures for the last two years are October to October from the Met Police website.
In England and Wales as a whole, according to the latest Home Office statistics, the number of racially or religiously aggravated offences has fallen by 11.4 per cent over the last four years for which figures are available (page 20 of this PDF.)
As I say, statistics for purely faith hate crime alone going back over a long period are harder to find. But the latest online minutes of the Tower Hamlets Interfaith Forum, for the meeting held on 5 October 2010, show that in the months of August and September there were – wait for it – a grand total of seven faith hate crimes reported to the police in the borough, not all of which from the description in fact appear to be faith hate crimes. The previous minutes, for the 15 June meeting, showed a total of eight faith hate crimes between April 1 and June 14, of which only two were against Muslims.[2]However, the same article quoted some interesting figures from the Metropolitan Police – the first I’ve seen on specifically Islamophobic incidents – which diametrically contradict both Mr Murad’s claim and the Sindy’s own. The paper said there had been “762 Islamophobic offences in London since April 2009, including 333 in 2010/11 and 57 since this April.” It said there were only a few forces which collect this data; figures from the other forces weren’t given.
If a total of 762 offences have been committed since April 2009, 57 of them since this April and 333 of them in 2010/11, that means the number committed in 2009/10 was 372. Between 09/10 and 10/11 there was therefore a drop of 39 offences – or more than 10 per cent.
I have to suspect, from the unusual way the paper presented the figures, that either it or the MCB was trying to conceal this inconvenient truth.[3][edit] United States
As with the situation in the United Kingdom, hate crimes against Muslims in the United states are dropping, not going up
Vandalism and intimidation were the most frequently reported incidents.
Incidents of anti-Jewish bias declined 10.7 percent, from 1,043 to 931, and incidents of anti-Muslim bias dropped 67.7 percent, from 481 to 155.[4]
Jewish victims of hate crimes outnumber Muslim victims by a 7-1 ratio
Only 11.1 percent were anti-Islamic, despite claims of rampant anti-Muslim bigotry in the U.S. by groups like the Council on American Islamic Relations.
Across the board, hate crimes in the U.S. dropped last year by 6 percent, according to the 2005 FBI report release last week, although violence against people based on their race accounted more than half of the reported incidents.
Police nationwide reported 7,163 hate crime incidents in 2005, targeting victims based on their race, ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation and disabilities. That was down from 2004, when the FBI reported 7,649 incidents.[5]
Anti-Muslim incidents only account for 1.3% of all hate crimes. Even anti-Christian (Catholic/Protestant) incidents outnumber anti-Muslim incidents in America, and Jewish victims of hate crimes outnumber Muslim victims by a 10-1 ratio
Press Release — Hate Crime Statistics Web Site
• “An analysis of the 7,780 single-bias incidents revealed that 51.3 percent were motivated by a racial bias”
• Anti-Black Racial Hate 2,876, Anti-Jewish Hate 1,013, Anti-Homosexual 1,200, Anti-Hispanic 561
• Anti-Islam Incidents – 105
Table 1
Incidents, Offenses, Victims, and Known Offenders
by Bias Motivation, 2008
2 The term known offender does not imply that the identity of the suspect is known, but only that an attribute of the suspect has been identified, which distinguishes him/her from an unknown offender.
3 In a multiple-bias incident, two conditions must be met: (a) more than one offense type must occur in the incident and (b) at least two offense types must be motivated by different biases.[6]
The district investigated eight incidents brought to their attention by the Minnesota chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, or CAIR.
School board member Jerry Von Korff said the district found no evidence to support seven out of the eight complaints filed by the Minnesota chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations.[7]
[edit] References
- ↑ Michael Sandelson - Jewish Community ‘disappointed’ over Muslim apology - The Foreigner, June 10, 2011
- ↑ Andrew Gilligan - Islamophobia: is this the year's most embarrassing academic report? - The Telegraph, December 2, 2010
- ↑ Andrew Gilligan - Islamophobic crime fell in London last year – MCB spins the opposite - The Telegraph, June 13, 2011
- ↑ FBI Hate Crime Report - LGF, Nov 12, 2003
- ↑ American Jews top hate-crime targets - WorldNetDaily, October 23, 2006
- ↑ FBI Releases 2008 Hate Crime Statistics - R.E.A.L. Organization, November 23, 2009
- ↑ Ambar Espinoza - St. Cloud school officials say harassment complaints not valid - Minnesota Public Radio, May 13, 2010